A judges’ opinion is never right.
But a judges’ opinion does have might.
Substantiated statements have height.
But only applicable facts are purely right.
A judges’ sentence has plenty of fright.
But disproportionate punishment is never right.
Only restitution is the light.
But prophylaxis is sometimes a necessary bite.
A judges’ opinion is never right.
But a judges’ opinion does have might.
Substantiated statements have height.
But only applicable facts are purely right.
A judges’ crime is the night.
When loss and injury is the sight
To follow false law is the blight.
State revenge is just not right.
A judges’ opinion is never right.
But a judges’ opinion does have might.
Substantiated statements have height.
But only applicable facts are purely right.
For a judge to pervert a constitutional right
Is to diminish freedom without a fight.
True is a greater number of right.
Not just for all of the bright.
A judges’ opinion is never right.
But a judges’ opinion does have might.
Substantiated statements have height.
But only applicable facts are purely right.
Left or right is not for the bright.
The only true freedom is to follow the light.
War is not the state right.
Patriots seem against the state with all their might.
A judges’ opinion is never right.
But a judges’ opinion does have might.
Substantiated statements have height.
But only applicable facts are purely right.
—- Original poem by the author of this site
Main Entry: opin·ion
Pronunciation: &-‘pin-y&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin opinion-, opinio, from opinari
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter b : APPROVAL, ESTEEM
2 a : belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held view
3 a : a formal expression of judgment or advice by an expert b : the formal expression (as by a judge, court, or referee) of the legal reasons and principles upon which a legal decision is based
OK, I buy into that. Reads poetically like broad brushstrokes, but I understand that sometimes a judge isn’t required to give reasons or law to back up his decisions. That means the victim of a judicial decision has to be psychic to resolve the reason for the decision in order to conduct future business.
A verdict without reason cannot be critiqued. Courts aren’t even required to give reasons for their decisions. That is wrong!