Definition of Liberal and Conservative

The following definitions are given to clear up words that are often mangled by political candidates that wish to re-define their opponents.

Conservatism:
Synopsis: Conservatism is the tendency to prefer existing situations and support traditional power structures rather than change.

Conservatism received its classic formulation in the works of the British statesman Edmund Burke, notably his Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), in which he rejected the principles of the French Revolution and presented a comprehensive philosophy of society and politics. Burke viewed society as an organic whole, with individuals performing various roles and functions. In this society a natural elite—by virtue of birth, wealth, and education—is supposed to provide the leadership. The community is held together by venerable customs and traditions; gradual changes can be made, but only when they have gained wide acceptance. – From MSN Encarta

Liberalism:
Synopsis: Liberalism is the tendency to prefer the modification of existing situations and power structures in order to improve individual rights for all.

An influential early liberal was the English philosopher John Locke. In his political writings, which deeply influenced the framers of the U.S. Constitution, he argued for popular sovereignty, the right of rebellion against oppression, and toleration of religious minorities. According to the thought of Locke and his many followers, the state exists not to promote people’s spiritual salvation, but to serve its citizens and to guarantee their life, liberty, and property under a constitution. – From MSN Encarta

Radicalism is avocation of the views, practices, and policies of extreme change. The bill of rights is an example of a radical change. This bill was ratified in 1791, three years after the Constitution.

The word was first used in the political sense in England, when the British statesman Charles James Fox asked for “a radical reform” that would extend the franchise to universal manhood suffrage. The term radical afterward indicated those in support of parliamentary reform. After the passage of the Reform Bill of 1832, a measure primarily benefiting the middle class,[…] – From MSN Encarta

Reactionary:
Synopsis: Resistance or opposition to a force, influence, or movement frequently with a tendency toward a former and usually outmoded political or social order or policy.

Reactionary comes from the French word réactionnaire, coined in the early 19th century. It was the first of the two words coined (the other being conservative, from the French word conservateur) for the opposition to the French Revolution. “In parliamentary usage, the monarchists were commonly referred to as the Right, although they were often called Reactionaries.” This is the first time the word was used to mean “A movement towards the reversal of an existing tendency or state” or a “return to a previous condition of affairs.”

The earliest English-language use cited in the OED is by John Stuart Mill in 1840: “The philosophers of the reactionary school—of the school to which Coleridge belongs.” – Wikipedia.org

Posted in Definitions | 1 Comment

Present Free Trade Policies are Communistic

Trade is defined as giving in exchange for another commodity. Trade is barter; making an exchange. Trade means to engage in frequent buying and selling of (as stocks or commodities).

Free is defined as not obstructed, restricted, or impeded.

Free trade is defined as not subject to government regulation; not hampered or restricted in its normal operation; having no government restrictions; Free trade is a two way process. Free trade, in order to be optimal, requires that both trading partners buy and sell in equal amounts.

People used to think Salem Massachusetts was a country because there were so many ships from Salem in their ports. Tariffs were the primary tax of 19th century America when Ships from Salem Massachusetts did as much trade as entire countries. Perhaps if corporate taxes were considered tariffs on American products, politicians and economists wouldn’t loath the concept of an equal tariff on foreign products. Tariffs may equalize trade, thus increasing the total amount of the trade.

Would you rather buy a Toyota made in the USA for $25,000 while earning $50,000 a year, or be unemployed and buy a Toyota made in China for $20,000? Worse yet, be labeled by a callous government as a person who has “dropped out of the labor force” when your unemployment compensation ends. Tariffs protect the worker as much as they maximize and protect free trade.

US Industry pays more for employee benefits than some nations pay for employee salaries. How can trade between nations be equal and optimal under these conditions? Tariffs must be introduced to increase the trade. Tariffs protect and optimize free trade.

Government regulations tilt the playing field by giving one side the edge over the other. Tariffs can increase free trade (the total two way trade) by offsetting one government’s distortion of the trade markets.

H. Ross Perot called Free trade a “Giant Sucking Sound” that would suck jobs out of the USA.

Arguably, the present free trade policies are communistic to the extent that they facilitate suppression and equalization of wages and prices by government. Isn’t communism defined as equality of wages and living conditions? The Czars and CEOs, of course, will still have large salaries in a communist style system. “Free Trade” has suppressed total American manufacturing wages more than all other factors combined.

Justification for calling present Free Trade Policies Communistic proceeds from definitions such as the Wikipedia definitions for the words reactionary and communism:

In Marxist terminology, reactionary is generally used with a pejorative meaning to refer to people whose ideas might appear pro-working class but in essence contain elements of feudalism, capitalism, nationalism, fascism, or other ruling class characteristics.

Reactionary comes from the French word réactionnaire, coined in the early 19th century. It was the first of the two words coined (the other being conservative, from the French word conservateur) for the opposition to the French Revolution. “In parliamentary usage, the monarchists were commonly referred to as the Right, although they were often called Reactionaries.”[2]

Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of a classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production. [1] It is usually considered a branch of the broader socialist movement that draws on the various political and intellectual movements that trace their origins back to the work of theorists of the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution.

The present Free Trade Policies are further right than conservatism. They are reactionary in that they promote extreme wealth simultaneously with extremely harsh conditions for the working class and those that cannot find work. The resulting society being similar to that of both communist and precommunistic Russia.

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

The Iraq war is largely about oil

In his recent memoir, former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said: “I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: The Iraq war is largely about oil.”

More on War for Oil

This month, an exhaustive Pentagon-sponsored review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents captured during the 2003 U.S. invasion found no evidence that Saddam’s regime had any operational links with the al Qaida terrorist network.

Yahoo Report

Bush: “You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.” –interview with CBS News’ Katie Couric, Sept. 6, 2006

Bush: “I’m the commander — see, I don’t need to explain — I do not need to explain why I say things. That’s the interesting thing about being president.” –as quoted in Bob Woodward’s Bush at War

Bush: “F*ck Saddam. We’re taking him out.” –to three U.S. senators in March 2002, one year before the Iraq invasion, as quoted by Time magazine

Definitions of Words for a Presidential Campaign

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

Does the law control government? Is there any separation of power?

In 2005, as Siegelman was preparing his 2006 campaign, he was indicted for accepting a bribe – specifically appointing the businessman Richard Scrushy to a state hospital board in exchange for a contribution to a campaign for a state lottery to fund education. This seems suspicious to me, because Siegelman did not profit personally from that exchange, he didn’t pocket any money for himself – so I don’t see how that is a bribe. Elected officials across the country appoint people who contribute to their political campaigns without facing criminal charges.

From www.bestandworst.com

Law enforcement officials said the governor — the millionaire heir to a New York real estate fortune — had hired prostitutes several times before and had spent tens of thousands of dollars, and perhaps as much as $80,000, on the high-priced escort service Emperors Club VIP, whose women charge as much as $5,500 an hour.

From Yahoo News

Albert Arnold “Al” Gore, Jr. (born March 31, 1948) is the former forty-fifth Vice President of the United States, who served from 1993 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton. Gore also served in the U. S. House of Representatives (1977–85) and the U. S. Senate (1985–93), representing Tennessee. Gore was the Democratic nominee for president in the 2000 election, ultimately losing to the Republican candidate George W. Bush in spite of winning the popular vote. A legal controversy over the Florida election recount was eventually settled in favor of Bush by the Supreme Court.[1][2]

A prominent environmental activist, Gore was awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize (together with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) for the “efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.”[3] He also starred in the Academy Award – winning documentary on the topic of global warming, An Inconvenient Truth. In 2007, Gore helped to organize the July 7 benefit concert for global warming, Live Earth.

From Al Gore – Wikipedia

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

Where to spend your rebate check

Recently, the Administration said each one of us would get a $600 rebate check.
There are other amounts depending on individual circumstances…..HOWEVER
If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China. If we
spend it on gasoline it will all go to the Arabs, and neither will help the
American economy.

We need to keep that money here in America, so the
only way I can see to keep that money here at home is to buy beer,
spend it on prostitution, or play golf since those are the only American
businesses still in the U.S.! Your cooperation will be appreciated.

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

Ronald Reagan’s Terrorist Threat

The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’
Ronald Reagan

I don’t believe in a government that protects us from ourselves.
Ronald Reagan

People don’t start wars, governments do.
Ronald Reagan

Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.
Ronald Reagan

The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them away.
Ronald Reagan

The government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan

To sit back hoping that someday, someway, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last–but eat you he will.
Ronald Reagan

Coersion, after all, merely captures man. Freedom captivates him.
Ronald Reagan

History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
Ronald Reagan, Address to the Nation, Jan 16, 1984

Don’t be afraid to see what you see.
Ronald Reagan

I have left orders to be awakened at any time in case of national emergency, even if I’m in a cabinet meeting.
Ronald Reagan

If you’re afraid of the future, then get out of the way, stand aside. The people of this country are ready to move again.
Ronald Reagan

The remainder of Reagan’s quotes are from his candidacy announcement at: http://reagan2020.us/speeches/candidacy_announcement.asp

“The people have not created this disaster in our economy; the federal government has. It has overspent, overestimated, and over-regulated. It has failed to deliver services within the revenues it should be allowed to raise from taxes. In the 34 years since the end of World War II, it has spent $448 billion more than it has collected in taxes — $448 billion of printing-press money, which has made every dollar you earn worth less and less. At the same time, the federal government has cynically told us that high taxes on business will in some way “solve” the problem and allow the average taxpayer to pay less. Well, business is not a taxpayer; it is a tax collector. Business has to pass its tax burden on to the customer as part of the cost of doing business. You and I pay taxes imposed on business every time we go to the store. Only people pay taxes, and it is political demagoguery or economic illiteracy to try and tell us otherwise.

The key to restoring the health of the economy lies in cutting taxes. At the same time, we need to get the waste out of federal spending. This does not mean sacrificing essential services, nor do we need to destroy the system of benefits which flow to the poor, elderly, the sick and the handicapped. We have long since committed ourselves, as a people, to help those among us who cannot take care of themselves. But the federal government has proven to be the costliest and most inefficient provider of such help we could possibly have.

We must put an end to the arrogance of a federal establishment which accepts no blame for our condition, cannot be relied upon to give us a fair estimate of our situation and utterly refuses to live within its means. I will not accept the supposed “wisdom” which has it that the federal bureaucracy has become so powerful that it can no longer be changed or controlled by any administration. As President I would use every power at my command to make the federal establishment respond to the will and the collective wishes of the people.

We must force the entire federal bureaucracy to live in the real world of reduced spending, streamlined function and accountability to the people it serves. We must review the function of the federal government to determine which of those are the proper province of levels of government closer to the people.

The 10th article of the Bill of Rights is explicit in pointing out that the federal government should do only those things specifically called for in the Constitution. All others shall remain with the states or the people. We haven’t been observing that 10th article of late. The federal government has taken on functions it was never intended to perform and which it does not perform well. There should be a planned, orderly transfer of such functions to states and communities and a transfer with them of the sources of taxation to pay for them.

The savings in administrative overhead would be considerable and certainly there would be increased efficiency and less bureaucracy.”

“In recent weeks there has been much talk about “excess” oil company profits. I don’t believe we’ve been given all the information we need to make a judgment about this. We should have that information. Government exists to protect us from each other. It is not government’s function to allocate fuel or impose unnecessary restrictions on the marketplace. It is government’s function to determine whether we are being unfairly exploited and if so to take immediate and appropriate action. As President I would do exactly that.”

“In recent months leaders in our government have told us that, we, the people, have lost confidence in ourselves; that we must regain our spirit and our will to achieve our national goals. Well, it is true there is a lack of confidence, an unease with things the way they are. But the confidence we have lost is confidence in our government’s policies. Our unease can almost be called bewilderment at how our defense strength has deteriorated. The great productivity of our industry is now surpassed by virtually all the major nations who compete with us for world markets. And, our currency is no longer the stable measure of value it once was.”

http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/government/
http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Ronald_Reagan
http://reagan2020.us/speeches/candidacy_announcement.asp

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

If I was the president in 2001

Minutes after the fall of the twin towers on 911, I predicted that America would bomb barren mountains, invade an innocent country and not find Bin Laden. What happened exceeded my worst case scenario.

If I was the president in 2001,
I would have read my FBI reports about possible terrorist attacks.
I would have advised that box cutters not be allowed on planes.
I would have advised that an Air Marshall be on each plane.
I would have advised that locks be on cockpit doors.
I would advised that game programs that give people the coordinates for the towers not be allowed

If 911 had still happened,
I absolutely would not have even considered invading Iraq.

If my military advisors had twisted my arm in a moment of weakness,
I would have required a plan that proved that the invasion would have produced a positive cash flow and a positive flow in human terms (more lives saved than lost)
I would have required WMDs to be found as a prerequisite for invasion.
I would have followed the methods of Bush the father by getting foreign governments to pay for and support the Iraqi war.

If the invasion of Iraq had still happened,
I would have built a military base out of harm’s way in central Iraq. A fortified and largely underground military base would have been supplied by a new airport. The base would have been beyond the reach of small rockets, suicide attackers,and road-side bombs. The base would have existed to store tanks and other supplies in case another military action was necessary in the area.
I would have created Iraqi jobs that would be paid for by the Iraqi oil wealth. This would have increased the money supply which would have created a strong free market. The ousted soldiers and former government employees would have had jobs. It’s less likely for people to bite the hand that feeds them…
I would not have caused complete anarchy by destroying the military and the government of Iraq.
I would not have policed Iraq.
I would have gotten all the principles together for a discussion.

I would not have continued a war like a bad investment or a gambler that refused to quit after an enormous loss.

I would never run for president, since I have not been a member of the skull and bones club. I would, however, work on a presidential staff or advise via a web site.

Posted in Dystopian Government | Leave a comment

Were I Running for President II

Were I running for president, I would discuss the defects in the American government. I would say that defects persist because they are being ignored. I would encourage government to start a low cost program to actually talk to people to find out what they don’t like about government. (This program would create interesting jobs as a side benefit.) This would not be a poll, mind you, but an open discussion about what government defects should be eliminated.

The results of the described investigation would be entered into a database (anonymously, if requested). The database would be available for all. The purpose of the database would be to encourage discussion to eliminate government defects.

One defect with the American government is that there are over 2 million Americans in jail. The rate of American incarceration is ten times the rate of incarceration in China. It is seven times higher than the rate in Europe and seven times the rate we used to have in America.

A related defect is that many of these people have been proven to be innocent by DNA testing and that many more are innocent without any DNA evidence with which to be exonerated.

A related defect is that American, as a result of this expense and persecution, does not have a lower crime rate than it had in the 1970’s. Nor does America have a lower crime rate that other industrialized countries of the world.

Related defects are police brutality, twenty million arrests a year, over burdened courts, over burdened public defenders.

Another related defect is that twenty million innocent people representing twenty million American families comprised of 86 million people that have to pay as much as a hundred billion each year to prove that they are innocent.

Another related defect is that there are 55 black men in jail for every white woman, in spite of rampant prostitution (the legalization of which should be considered).

Is there any presidential candidate that is not ignoring these defects?

By the way, were Al Gore drafted (www.draftgore.com) , he would be a much better candidate now than the candidate that beat Bush (in the popular vote) the first time. Al even looks more distinguished than the first time he ran! He is also infinitely more respected in the world outside of America.

Posted in Dystopian Government, Dystopian Justice | Leave a comment

Were I running for President

Were I running for president, I would support the principle that all programs be engineered and voted on as integrated programs. We wouldn’t buy a car engine, chassis, seats, air conditioner, and brakes separately would we? Ha! that would be absurd! But that is exactly the way our engineer-less government works! Ha!

Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the men of old; seek what they sought.
MATSUO BASHO Reflections.com

Were I running for president, I would support the principle that everyone must be able to have a job or income that provides for housing, food, education, clothing, shelter, utilities and basic health care.

Were I running for president, I would back the principle that all Americans must be able to have basic health care for antibiotics, setting bones, simple operations etc.

Were I running for president, I would support the principle that all government plans must adhere to a budget agreed to by the people. For example, ten percent of government revenue should go to defense; twenty percent of government revenue should go to basic health care; thirty percent of all government revenue should go to social security; twenty percent of government revenue should go to the creation of jobs and income; twenty percent of government revenue should go for all other government expenditures.

Were I running for president, I would support the principle that both the people and the representatives should approve the basic spending percentages and total government revenue.

Were I running for president, I would support the principle that government should encourage the development of systems that would allow the budget to be met. For example, if people need housing to cost less than $800 a month, then the government should lead the way with intelligence, knowledge and planning. For example, a large pre-fab house can be bought for $100,000. $800 a month is $9600 a year which is 9.6 percent of the principal each year.

No support of the given examples is intended. The given examples are just plausible ways to interpret the principles that I do support.

Posted in Utopia in General | Leave a comment

The Courts Almighty; the Deity that Isn’t

Sarcastic Question by Reader: “Who needs examples when the prisons are overflowing with “innocent” folks put there by the unjust and corrupt legal system you imagine?”

Indeed, the prisons are literally overflowing with people that have been disproportionately punished for victimless crimes.

If justice is restitution, then system is unjust; the system is slanted towards “Pax Washington” terrorism to invoke fear into the hearts of Americans should they be accused of breaking the million secret commandments of our con men representatives.

I fear the wrath of the almighty government con men via the courts of cruel and usual punishments. Why hasn’t the fear worked on you? Just wait till some pretty little thing accuses you of a rape you didn’t do. Ha Ha in advance, as you will be too busy fighting the government inquisition to post here when the time comes.

The courts’ propaganda is so great, that it can even make you think you’ve done crimes that you haven’t done!

It is human nature to believe that if you are being punished you did something wrong.

All heil the fuehrer, the fatherland’s sanctified and mighty courts.

May God appropriately bless those that cover-up crimes of nationalism.

Posted in Dystopian Justice | Leave a comment