Utopianstates Blog

The children on these cars think they are driving, even if the cars are on tracks. They love it!

The child adults of America think their vote actually does something. They really get all excited about voting. They even argue with one another as if it meant something.

We argue about what the mysterious “others” want us to argue about. The “tracks” are the perennial issues of abortion, gun laws, taxes and the military. What car do we want? The car made by the Democratic party or the car made by the Republican party. Both cars will go down the same set of tracks (laid by the mysterious others) whether made by the Democrats or the Republicans.

Like cars on the highway. The highway tells us where to go. The cops tell us how fast to go. We have the freedom to crash our vehicle or get a ticket. That’s freedom friends.

Paris Hilton Adv Why not?

This site also endorses the Libetarian Party. The following statement of principles is from the Libertarian Party site at Libertarian Statement of Principles

We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

Governments throughout history have regularly operated on the opposite principle, that the State has the right to dispose of the lives of individuals and the fruits of their labor. Even within the United States, all political parties other than our own grant to government the right to regulate the lives of individuals and seize the fruits of their labor without their consent.

We, on the contrary, deny the right of any government to do these things, and hold that where governments exist, they must not violate the rights of any individual: namely, (1) the right to life — accordingly we support the prohibition of the initiation of physical force against others; (2) the right to liberty of speech and action — accordingly we oppose all attempts by government to abridge the freedom of speech and press, as well as government censorship in any form; and (3) the right to property — accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationalization, and eminent domain, and support the prohibition of robbery, trespass, fraud, and misrepresentation.

Since governments, when instituted, must not violate individual rights, we oppose all interference by government in the areas of voluntary and contractual relations among individuals. People should not be forced to sacrifice their lives and property for the benefit of others. They should be left free by government to deal with one another as free traders; and the resultant economic system, the only one compatible with the protection of individual rights, is the free market.

The government of 1792 America was superior to today’s government if only because the lack of taxes, bureaucracy and law would facilitate easy improvement. Surprisingly, ultra liberals, ultra conservatives, radicals, and reactionaries, agree. This isn’t only a right or left wing conclusion; this is a unifying principle. You see, right really does meet left. It isn’t just theory.

The years subsequent to 1792 showed that that early government was flawed. The bill of rights didn’t protect human rights sufficiently to protect the Indians and slaves from subjugation, abuse, torture and even death.. Nor did those early rights give women the right to vote. The 1792 enumeration of rights were not sufficient to keep government from denying rights to prisoners and other captives. The 1792 enumeration of rights did not grant sufficient rights to taxpayers and property owners. The 1792 enumeration of rights were also not sufficient to keep government from thinking that government itself — the laws, procedures, and buildings — were more important than the collective population. The 1792 enumeration of rights were also not sufficient to keep government, and government employees from being accorded prejudicially favored treatment.

With some adjustments to the bill of rights, this government could be rebooted to a much saner government.

My informal polling in barber shops, classes, work environment, at home and with friends does not find ANY that have indicated they intend to vote for Obama or even that they like Obama. This poll was conducted in Massachusetts among voters that traditionally vote with the Democratic party. The numbers and results of the poll are statistically significant enough to say with 99% confidence that Obama will NOT get 50% of the vote in Massachusetts.

The results of my informal poll compare favorably to recent election results between Hillary and Obama.

There is no evidence or reason to believe that people than preferred Bush to Gore were reversing their preferences. There is no reason or evidence to indicate that people that voted for Bush in the last two elections will now vote for Obama.

There is evidence and reason to believe that women and others that supported Hillary are now making plans NOT to vote for Obama.

Only half the Democratic party voted for Obama. This 25% of the population was comprised of people of African decent (about 13% of the population). In other words, Fifty percent of the people that voted for Obama were predominately of African decent. Obama will not get this favorable an outcome from an electorate that is 77% on non African decent.

Major polling companies give Obama a 5% lead in the general election. This, when compared with the first several paragraphs shows a split in the space-time continuum. The given explanation that the young are voting for Obama is not an adequate reason to explain the totally irreconcilable differences between observation and traditional polls. My poll is somewhat flawed in that it was taken of a population set that is significantly older and more white than normal. Some Hispanics contributed to the poll.

Conclusion: The polling organizations are either lying or there is unexplained phenomena or meddling at work.

I don’t presently endorse any candidate.